Add Row 
Add 
Shift from 1099 to W-2: A Strategic Move for Financial Advisors
In recent years, the trend of transitioning advisors from 1099 affiliations to W-2 employees has gained significant momentum, with firms like Signature Estate and Investment Advisors (SEIA) leading the charge. The $32 billion hybrid registered investment advisor has successfully shifted 10 advisor groups from independent contractor status to W-2 employees over the past year, indicating a broader shift within the industry that promises stability and growth potential for financial advisors.
The Evolution of Advisor Models
SEIA's President Matt Matrisian, who transitioned from AssetMark earlier this year, emphasizes the importance of having advisors fully embedded within the company’s ecosystem. “We want them to be advisors so they don’t have to be business owners doing HR, operations, and all the other functions,” he states. By absorbing these operational costs, SEIA positions itself as a firm that prioritizes advisor efficiency and client engagement. The drive towards shifting advisors into a W-2 model aligns with the firm's long-term vision of creating a unified and robust financial advisory platform.
Advantages of the W-2 Model
Adopting a W-2 model often presents multiple advantages for both firms and advisors. According to industry experts like Jessica Polito from Turkey Hill Management, firms with W-2 employees enjoy higher valuations and steadier cash flows than those reliant on independent contractors. This is largely due to the predictable nature of cash flows generated by W-2 employees, reducing the uncertainty associated with 1099 advisors who operate as free agents. Thus, transitioning to a W-2 model not only solidifies a firm's market position but also provides advisors with enhanced business support.
Challenges in the Transition
Despite the advantages, the shift from a 1099 to a W-2 structure is not without challenges. Advisors often face the dilemma of relinquishing control over their revenue and operational independence—a significant concern for many seasoned professionals. SEIA has crafted a structured approach to this transition by offering compelling buyout packages and equity stakes in the firm, enticing advisors to consider the longer-term benefits over short-term control. As expressed by veteran advisor Mark Copeland, embracing the W-2 model requires building trust in the firm’s vision and support capabilities, enabling a smoother transition.
Future Trends in Wealth Management Employment Models
The trend towards adopting a W-2 model is expected to rise, particularly among firms backed by private equity. SEIA's approach exemplifies how independent broker/dealers are recognizing the need to operationalize their offerings and appeal to advisors looking for stability and resources to enhance growth potential. Future industry standards may well lean towards models that prioritize employee benefits and organizational support structures, paving the way for a less fragmented and more integrated advisory landscape.
As the financial advisory sector evolves, the benefits of a W-2 employee model may increasingly outweigh traditional 1099 structures, signaling a significant shift in how advisors align their business strategies with firm partnerships. For financial planners and wealth advisers, this transition heralds opportunities to enhance efficiency, drive growth, and ultimately provide better service to their clients.
To stay ahead in the shifting landscape of financial planning, advisors must evaluate the long-term implications of their affiliation models, ensuring they align with their professional goals and market dynamics.
Write A Comment